About this post: In April of 2012, I attended a workshop/session at Iowa 1:1 Institute in Des Moines, IA led by John Nash, Associate Professor of Educational Leadership Studies at the University of Kentucky. The session was titled “How to Include Students as Co-Designers in your 1:1 Planning”. As an introduction into why we need to consider students in the design and implementation of new policies and procedures, Nash drew a brief comparison between education and Zappos.com. It was a seedling that I’ve been thinking about for the past few months (while doing some online shopping) and this is where my educational philosophy has ended up.
Have you ever ordered anything from Zappos.com? It’s your standard online retail store, specializing in shoes. Nothing glitzy or radically innovative on the surface. And yet is stands as the model I think about when approaching my classroom and education in the future.
Zappos does the same thing that many other online (and physical) retailers do. Where they separate themselves is in their customer service. So why should education follow these footsteps? Education is a service and teachers are in the service industry. We don’t make anything; we don’t build anything. Rather than focus on the things, we should focus on people we serve: our customers.
This can snowball into a larger debate: “Who is the customer?” in terms of education. Parents? Community? Students? I feel like my profession doesn’t exist without my students. I serve no purpose if I serve no students. Students in our classrooms and in our schools are our customers, and too often education only refers to and insinuates their needs and desires. (read more in a post by John Nash on Service Design and Education) Zappos has become successful because of their commitment to their customers, addressing needs, considering feedback and creating an overall environment centered around the consumer experience. Can educators duplicate that commitment?
One things Zappos does to entice its customers is to offer free shipping, everyday and with no strings attached. They make their product very easy to get. It’s not that paying for shipping is that much of an obstacle if I really wanted a pair of shoes, but the fact that the company is willing to offer me that little extra in order to make their products more accessible does not go unnoticed. Do educators send a message to the students that we think learning should be easily accessible? Sometimes it feels like the system is setup so that students, parents and teachers are more concerned about the end product (the grade, the test, the score) than the process (the learning). Those ends results are inevitable: there will be shoes at Zappos, there will be tests in education. But focusing on those end details don’t necessarily create a recipe for success. Schools and businesses have to find a way to connect to their consumer and think about the best way to deliver their service in an easy and pleasing fashion.
I go to Zappos to find shoes. That’s not really innovative and can be done at most online retail shops. One thing Zappos does real well is providing its customer with many different search options. I can search shoes by size, by color, by brand, by occasion, by heel height, by material, by season, by accents – – you get the picture. The end results is a customized shopping experience, built around options that I choose. The searching options allow me to focus in specifically on what I want rather than searching through the exact same standard search pages that every other consumer does. Do our students have the ability to customize their own learning experience or do we have them cycle through the same educational experience as every student? Educational psychologists have done extensive research on personalized learning theories, most notably Thomas Dewey and Howard Gardner. Students learn better when they are personally invested in the material and the process. Customization, options and differentiation is the way to do this. Allow students to reach the end objectives through their own chosen path. Zappos doesn’t care if I find the Franco Sarto Track book by searching through 100 pages, creating a customized search or by searching customer reviews – – they just want me to get from point A to point B. Each educational objective is a similar learning journey: start here and by the end, be here. Let students play a role in the customization of their educational experience by giving them options and supporting that journey.
Return Policy and Follow-Up
Zappos is relentless in their follow-up to every purchase. They want to know if the product and the experience was satisfactory. And they truly care about that feedback. I had to return a pair of shoes once because it was the wrong size. They apologized, the return shipping was free and they sent me a new size immediately – – before I could pack up the old shoes and send them back. It wasn’t about who’s fault it was – – there was no fault, just an unsuccessful purchase. But they reached out, inquired about the purchase and immediately set out to improve my shoe buying experience. Do educators seek out feedback from students about their overall educational experience, including policy, procedures, etc.? This echoes a lot of what John Nash talked about in his workshop about including students in rolling out a 1:1 program. We do these things in education ‘for the students’, yet many times never consult a student on the design and implementation of different programs. Most professional development is designed to make us better educators ‘for our students’, but how often are students involved in professional development?
The extension of asking for feedback is following up and acknowledging that feedback. How do we respond to student feedback? Every shopping experience at Zappos might not work for everyone, just like each educational approach might not work for every student. Zappos believes that if it doesn’t work for you, return it and they will do what they can to “get it right”. Educators should make a similar commitment to “getting it right” for the students; gathering feedback and modifying the experience until the outcome is satisfactory for everyone.
Last fall I bought a nice pair of black ankle boots through Zappos. Yesterday I logged on and Zappos generated some suggestions for me based on my previous shopping experience. They also have geographical information on me and suggested some shoes based upon the winter months in Iowa. Maybe they know too much information about me. Maybe it’s like an invasion of privacy. I like to think of it more like they keep in mind my personal interests and use that information to make my next experience one I’m more likely to be interested in. Do we know our students well enough to be able to create learning experiences that incorporate their personal interests? I’ve never read a word of Twilight or Harry Potter, but I understand that many of my students not only have but are unnecessarily fanatic about them. So every once and awhile I reference them and other pop culture phenomena in our activities. This takes a cookie-cutter activity and makes is a more personal one that they students are more likely to connect to. Being aware of student personal interests can also help out in the customization options I mentioned earlier.
Connecting with the customer and setting out to enhance their experience has a tendency to get a lot of eye rolls and criticism from the educational community because it’s too fluffy sounding. We can’t allow students to dictate the future of education – – we have to live in the real world where there are mandates and standards, a common core and decades of educational research that shouldn’t be replaced in order to just put smiles on a 14 year old’s face. And I couldn’t agree with that point more . . .
Quarterly Projections and Objectives
Let’s not make any mistake about it: Zappos is in the business to sell shoes. They have a bottom line, sales goals, quarterly reports, stakeholders, quotas and everything like that. All those fluffy things they do to enhance the consumer experience are great, but in the end if they don’t sell X amount of shoes in a month, it really doesn’t matter. Schools are much the same way. No Child Left Behind or not, public schools will always answer to some state or federal standards. Test scores matter. Graduation rates matter. In my own classroom, I have standards and objectives to reach in every unit. The goal is to get there, to meet those objectives. What pathway do I take to get there? Zappos chose to reach those objectives by dedicating themselves to customer service. By adopting that philosophy, I can reach my objectives while creating a positive learning experience for my students. It’s not a choice between the two: meet educational objectives or make my students happy. It’s symbiotic; each part enhancing the success of the other.
Not “Schools Run Like a Business”
Just Google “Schools Run Like a Business” and the literature from pundits will overwhelm you. I don’t feel like this philosophical approach to education is promoting schools run like businesses. Schools are not the place for a “no shirts, no shoes, no service” type of mentality. Certainly poverty and funding play a huge role in educational success, and I’m not suggesting that poor performing schools go the way of WonderBread, leaving us with only profitable institutions. It’s more about the mindset of successful business leaders and the philosophy behind building a successful business. Guy Kawasaki, a venture capitalist tied to Apple’s success, cites these 10 steps for a successful leader in business: Be likable, be trustworthy, perfect your service, tell a great story, overcome resistance, make your enchantment enduring, be a great presenter, use technology, enchant up and enchant down (read full article here). Which of those principles could not be applied to a successful educator?
Guy Kawasaki and Apple have been quite successful over the past decade or so. So has Zappos.com. Unfortunately you’ll find enough people that believe that the educational system doesn’t experience that same amount of success. I don’t think that things are categorically bad or broken right now, but I do think that schools can gain momentum if we approached education like Zappos.
“When you have two coffee shops right next to each other, and each sells the exact same coffee at the exact same price, service design is what makes you walk into one and not the other” (31 Volts Service Design, 2008, cited in Stickdorn & Schneider, 2010, p. 33).
Why do students walk into our schools everyday? Geography isn’t a good enough reason for me – – however unrelenting that reason is. What experience do we offer students that other institutions don’t? How can we be different?
For more on John Nash, please check out: http://reformbydesign.posterous.com and follow him on Twitter @jnash